29.01.24.13.30tutorial

Back to that time of tutorial – tutorial with Jonathon Kearney – who is quite remarkable as a teacher – smart, engaged & supportive.

I suspect I brought up the same question as the previous one – how do I tie my painting and drawing to my interests in history, politics, slime moulds, poetry, and literature. With a short diversion into diagrams, charts and numbers.

From the to-ing and fro-ing I brought up the possibility of modular art practise – everything connected but not necessarily available all at one time. Jonathon spoke about a book he had on new media art and creating art behaviour connecting with different points at different points in time / space digitally. I wondered whether a mushroom or lichen might be an interesting model. The lichen is a creature made up of many other creatures — the mushroom exists mostly beneath the surface with only the ‘fruit’ on the surface, the slime mould exists in all it’s body at once shifting its parts according to needs and environment….

Models for the thinking in thinking about art practise.

My first method of drawing – the way I learnt to draw – was I built forms from cross hatching, rather than planning a form according to what I see and then filling it in I would start at a point I thought interesting and build the forms using cross hatching, and occasional broken lines to track all the shapes. I would then take these forms between 2d and 3d and develop shapes I could keep on a thin line between familiar and unfamiliar. Drawing the human figure I could move the centre of gravity around and create a mix of fragile and dense, and recreate new forms using the structural integrity of the forms I’m observing. Painting and drawing are my ways of slowing down and focussing without needing much brain chatter – I simply direct my attention across the page.

I cannot work with cohesive beginning, middle, end; narrative. My brain doesn’t work like that. I need to work with anti-narrative. We discussed this – hence the analogies – I develop many lines of investigation at once. My drawing and painting holds its intensity as a form of quietude, this blog is how I test concurrent ideas – and reading – ideas that needn’t all be attendant at each exhibition / production. Quietude being slowness and contemplation here; allowing ideas to inform and be embodied in the arts.

‘Solaris’ and my notion of a future earth of mushrooms / slime mould came up.

Blake’s book of Urizen as a starting point from which apocalypse is inevitable. Urizen is the god of rationalism and rationalising – the mind forgd manacles – the cause of slavery and climate disaster; the first influence and primary subject of my immediate projects. Tracking and contextualising Blake in the antinomianism traditions I have books of writings by Levellers and Ranters. Potential local sources of information from archives and churches helps move through more recent and local history.

Plenty of material to draw inspiration from plus a deep well of techniques for production.

pencil on paper, a5 sketchbook.

provocation – fish provocation

creepy porcelain – figures of labourers, artisans, soldiers, drunks…. rendered in creepy porcelain presumably for the well to do place around their homes because…. I dunno, don’t know why anyone’d give them houseroom.

I draw them gives me something to work on I can mess with. I draw a lot of things because it aids my understanding of them – with these it helps me understand drawing, and really push how far I can warp dimensions, pose, expression, etc….

I do the same with paintings I despise people like ‘Sloshua’ Reynolds and boring period pieces.

I love Blake’s marginalia on sloshua – good use of the learning process (Blake attended some of Reynold’s lectures at the RCA).

this is from a Poussin – I have no real problem with Poussin – he leaves me a little cold but Cezanne seemed to love him so I keep an open mind.

pencil in a5 sketchbook

This is one way I learn from other artists

wave

Lots of things happening at the moment. I’ve been out photographing lichen and moss – that’s nothing new – lichens especially – fascinating. I was reading about how there might be 3 different forms of life working as a collective that forms lichen…. We also watched ‘The Creeping Garden’ a film on the subject of slime moulds. I never (knowingly found any slime moulds – though I’ll be looking from now on) Mushrooms, lichen, slime moulds, moss — amazing to look at & fascinating….

Aesthetically they have been influential.

microcosms

I rewatched Solaris (Tarkovski) too.

Someone has been breeding mushrooms to eat plastic

graffiti

the church graffiti at Kingston ‘All Saints & St. Anthony’

dots

pencil on paper, a5 sketchbook

connecting dots to make shapes. it’s something old probably – creating script – ancient, modern, global… connecting stars to make shapes

some of these are ‘nine man morris’ boards

no idea what the rest might be

Posted in art

iron oxide the cross

pencil on paper, a4 sketchbook.

Wall painting at All Saints and St. Andrews – angels catching the blood of Christ – not often a part of the story or at least not often depicted, I would guess because it’s weird and grisly. Beautiful church, filled with graffiti and wall paintings. Hard to tell how old the graffitti is…. but the paintings are gorgeous fulsome iron oxides, decayed and atrophied. What’s left are broad, hard to distinguish, broken up and merged with the graffiti and awkward splodges of paintings in even further degradation.

pencil on paper, a4 sketchbook.

Medieval painting, and traditions that kept the fantastical and highly inventive perspectives of pre- photography / academic perspective, are my preferred reference materials. I find academic perspective dull, I find photorealism dull, there are exceptions don’t get me wrong… but largely exceptions proving the rule.

pencil on paper, a4 sketchbook.

and here is a dead tradition, only documented in walking guides and architectural missives

antinomianism

Before going on to consider in detail his debt to the seventeenth century it will be as well to summarise the group of doctrines that make Antinomianism in the broad sense. They are closely related, but can conveniently be taken under four main heads.

First, there is the group of ideas dealing with the nature of God and with his relation to man. All the Antinomians believed that God existed in man, most that he existed in all created things, and many that he had no other existence. Blake held this last opinion.

Second, there is the conception that the moral and ceremonial law is no longer binding on God’s people, that it was the result of a curse which has now been lifted and that the orthodoxy which attempts to impose it is anti-christian.

Third, and closely related to this, is the whole complex of ideas associated with the Phrase, the Everlasting Gospel, a phrase which Blake took as the title of his last great poem.

And fourth, arising from all these, there is the symbolism of the destruction of Babylon and the building of Jerusalem, a symbolism with which Blake’s work is packed and whose relevance to an age of revolution hardly needs emphasis.

A. L. Morton, “The Everlasting Gospel: A Study in the Sources of William Blake” here.

my underling. sorry.

pencil on paper, a4 sketchbook